Legal research can initiate a new legal theory that can be traced back to your help in adopting the existing theory. The results of legal research can be useful in making desired changes to existing laws and legal institutions. Qualitative legal research is a subjective form of research based on the analysis of controlled observations of the legal researcher. In qualitative research, data are obtained from a relatively small group of subjects. The data are not analyzed using statistical techniques. Typically, narrative data is collected through qualitative research. Understanding research methods helps students systematically conduct and write their research monographs, dissertations or theses. Frontier research is conducted to explore areas about which the researcher has little or no knowledge. Exploratory research allows the researcher to formulate problems for further investigation, develop hypotheses and find the best solution. It is about finding the reason for things, events and situations, and showing why and how they became what they are. For example, many of our old laws were influenced by British rule. It was only later that we improved many laws and created new simplified laws after our independence. Another way to imagine this type of research would be to observe, develop a concept or theories compatible with previous theories and hopefully derive new theories from it.
Alternatively, lawyers may need legal research to simply provide clients with accurate legal advice. And in the case of law students, they often use legal research to fill out memos and briefs for the class. However, these are just some of the situations where legal research is needed. Descriptive research attempts to systematically describe a situation, problem, phenomenon, or behavior. A description is about making complicated things understandable and simple. Legal research is the process of identifying and retrieving the information needed to support judicial decision-making. In the broadest sense, legal research encompasses every step of an approach that begins with the analysis of the facts of a problem and ends with the application and communication of the results of the investigation. Quantitative legal research is a feature of descriptive legal research methodology, which attempts to collect quantifiable information used for statistical analysis of the population sample.
It is a popular research tool that allows us to collect and describe the nature of the demographic. Quantitative legal research collects information from existing and potential data using sampling techniques such as online surveys, online surveys, questionnaires, etc., the results of which can be presented in digital form. After careful understanding of these numbers, it is possible to predict the future and make changes to deal with the situation. Legal research is also important for a lawyer who should be familiar with the areas of law in which they claim to have the expertise to solve real-world problems. There is no denying that a lawyer must represent a client competently. Every lawyer needs the use of basic legal research tools and the implementation of an effective and efficient research plan for competent representation. The easiest way to find out if something is still a good law is to use a legal tool known as a Citator, which will show you subsequent cases where your source has been cited, as well as any negative stories, including whether they have been overturned, overturned, questioned, or simply differentiated. Like other research activities, legal research is a systematic and methodological study aimed at developing new knowledge or revising existing knowledge. Legal research is not only about technical knowledge of law.
Rather, one of the goals of legal research is to understand philosophical or political arguments in law. First, quantitative data are collected using various forms of statistical techniques based on the principles of mathematics and probability. The analysis appears to be based on objective laws rather than the researcher`s values. So if you`re just starting out, don`t be discouraged if you find legal research difficult – almost everyone does it at first. With enough time, patience and dedication, you will master the art of legal research. In most cases, the purpose of legal research is to find support for a particular legal issue or decision. For example, lawyers must conduct legal research when they need judicial advice (i.e., case law) to support a legal argument they submit to the court in a motion or factum. While the former involves analyzing theories, the latter deals with testing theories in the real world. Depending on the nature of the question, legal research is also classified as descriptive and exploratory. Qualitative research deals with the explanation, interpretation and understanding of phenomena, problems or things. It is the subjective assessment of the social or legal problem, situation and attitude.
It is mainly based on human perception and understanding. Now that the researcher has constructed a research hypothesis or question, identified sampling strategies, dealt with the protection of persons, etc., the researcher can complete the data processing methods sections of the study design. Essentially, these sections provide a blueprint for data analysis. They may include proposals for statistical operations and/or qualitative methods of analysis (e.g. thematic analysis) and technical specifications related to these methods (e.g. desired meaning). Writing this part of the study design can stimulate the refinement of other parts of the study design. For example, if a researcher realizes that they want to take a particular statistical test, they can double-check the level of measurement (e.g., nominal) of a particular survey item. A UCLA page titled “Which statistical analysis should I use?” [and how can I do this analysis in SAS, Stata, SPSS and R] suggests some of the refinements of the measurement plan that could result from writing this last section of the study plan. Further information on data processing and analysis can be found in chapters 7-13 of Lawless et al.`s Empirical Methods in Law and chapters 8-9 of Patton`s Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods.
Because of their subject matter and resource-intensive support ratio, courses with research-based learning elements are particularly suited to impart skills that are often only assumed but not systematically taught in daily teaching and legal education examinations. They deal directly with the criteria and added value of differentiated, balanced and problem-based argumentation. This deepening of methodological skills not only promotes student success in other traditional courses, but also exam quality significantly (Stadler and Broemel 2014; Broemel and Stadler, 2014). In addition to the rigor of reflection and emphasis, in particular the persuasive power of thought (cf. Broemel and Stadler 2014, pp. 1209, 1211 ff.), the essential quality criteria of the examinations correspond to the skills and competences taught and deepened in the courses on learning through research. In addition to the technical aspects of data management planning, research data must be handled in a manner that protects potential and actual research participants. The ethics of data retention focus on two concerns: anonymity and confidentiality. Anonymity protects the identity of the researchers` participant and/or readers of the study results.
Confidentiality protects participant data (e.g., answers to questions) from parties outside the research process. Anonymity is like a veil, confidentiality is like a lock. Some studies offer both, almost all studies target confidentiality. These safeguards only become useless when potentially compromising data has been destroyed, usually years after the study is completed. Further information on these topics can be found in the RMKB. In addition, as studies progress and especially as the exam approaches, the need for students to choose exam preparation courses increases. Even in courses that are directly focused on preparing relevant content for the exam, students expect each individual unit to be explicitly geared towards their preparation with respect to the specific requirements of written exams. In the final phase of legal studies, which would offer particularly good conditions for research-based interdisciplinary learning due to students` advanced status, students lack the time and motivation for labor-intensive courses that are not directly related to exams (Broemel and Muthorst 2012). A seeker must be a true seeker of truth. He must be vigilant to detect any change in the situation or facts taken into account in the research. He must have an intimate knowledge of his field of research.
It must proceed objectively.