020 7188 7188 Trust Offices, St Thomas` Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/ In this refusal to address the apparent abnormality revealed in images 7.13-7.15, GSTT`s response to my complaint merely recapitulates the serial cover-up of this evidence begun by the St. Thomas Department of Radiology in October 2008. The answer is therefore falsified and ultimately untenable. It appears as a tactical response, made with a cynical awareness of the anomaly revealed by the MRI, but whose purpose is to report an honest and open response to the content of the complaint in defense against the threat of immediate legal action. This can only be explained by recognizing the highly controversial nature of what is revealed by the evidence published in these pages and its impact on organized crime activities in certain areas of government and public health, and thus imposes an extraordinary degree of accountability on the person or organization that confirms its initial disclosure. Hazel joined us in December 2018 and provides legal and operational secretarial services in all areas of the charity. He advises the Board of Directors, the Executive Board and employees on all legal and governance matters. · Support teams such as ownership, staffing and human resources with their legal requirements, including creating, negotiating and agreeing documents, and as a one-stop shop for a variety of legal matters. Despite the existence of medical evidence irrevocably proving that a medical atrocity was committed against a five-year-old child in 1967 by surgeons working within the NHS, there is a “regime of silence” that opposes the disclosure of this evidence, which is effective in all major institutions in the UK and has so far prevented its open public debate. Given that my complaint against the institution in question (GSTT) for concealment of this evidence has reached its final stage without satisfactory resolution, and that there has been no explicit confirmation of the evidence by experts for further litigation before the courts, all that remains is an independent investigation into the alleged cover-up, which is conducted by the OSSP office. as the primary regulator of health care complaints.
Since the ASPP is now in possession of the evidence in question, it is incumbent upon the ASPP to examine the evidence in order to obtain legal knowledge for the first time; otherwise, there can be no public interest inquiry into the role of the PWGS in concealing this evidence. If the ASPP insisted on exercising its time limit for filing the complaint, it would unduly impede the conduct of a necessary investigation. Can you provide me with a contact email address from the legal department? Hazel provides legal and internal support in all areas of the Foundation. The OSSP offers the possibility of requesting a review of its decisions, which I therefore wanted. I considered that the reason for the OSSP`s manifestly unrealistic and unfair decision was that its decision had been made on the basis of insufficient information, and I was satisfied that if I had provided a more detailed explanation before March 2013 of the reasons that impeded my ability to file a coherent complaint, then the OSSP should have been reasonably satisfied that there were sufficient mitigating circumstances to justify an extension of time. In my letter requesting a review of their decision, I tried to explain the aspect of the circumstances I faced, including assassination attempts, after requesting a copy of the MRI footage from the St. Thomas Information Governance Department. – The circumstances that have developed exactly in line with this request and the different approaches I have taken with GSTT departments to follow up on my investigations into evidence: you will be working with a dynamic and highly motivated team at a time when support for the NHS and other health-focused initiatives is never more important. They are the first port of call for colleagues to develop new contracts documenting our key healthcare partnerships, working with the Foundation`s legal and governance team to provide legal advice and guidance on the Foundation`s innovative and impact-driven programs and activities, our work with Guy`s and St Thomas` NHS Foundation Trust and assist with various internal governance and compliance issues. We are looking for an accessible autonomous person who works well in a team and who has a keen interest in developing their skills and experience, particularly in terms of commercial contracts, financing documentation and partnership documentation. · Assist in supervising paralegals on the team and supervising specific tasks. My only expectation of the TPS is reasonable enough: that they report completely, openly and clearly on the evidence presented in their own departments.
However, the status of my complaint shows that the GST is completely undisciplined if it does not. So it seems that the GSTT is willing to stick to this cover-up, including the chief executive himself, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, simply because the consequences of an admission would be too devastating for them. The Legal Affairs and Governance team sits within the Foundation`s Operations Directorate. We are a small, agile entity that wants to tackle whatever comes our way to help the organization and our colleagues fulfill our charitable mission. As a team, our work covers a wide range of legal and governance issues, from commercial contracts and grant agreements, intellectual property advice, charitable limited fund requirements, fundraising, campaigns and political activities, to commissioning and compiling meeting materials for board and committee meetings, and secretarial duties. business. This role is essential to the development of our team and the work we do within the Foundation. As I understand it, the period during which a complaint can be filed begins when the complainant is aware of the causes of the complaint.
Therefore, it should have been difficult for the PSO to confirm its decision since, prior to the filing of the complaint in March 2013, there was no explicit confirmation of the evidence by experts and, therefore, no legal basis for filing a complaint, but only a rather vain hope that the GSTT would voluntarily admit its own cover-up. Even taking into account this error in judgment on the part of the PSPA, most regulators are prepared to extend their usual time limits for accepting complaints if: (a) extenuating circumstances that could have prevented a complaint from being filed in a timely manner; or: (b) clear reasons of public interest that make it desirable or imperative for the regulator to do so. · Act as a brainstorming partner with the team to discuss structuring, legal risks and strategic implications of partnerships and future opportunities. I am interested in learning more about the legal department at Guys and St. Thomas Hospital. · Identify, organize and provide training needs on key legal and compliance issues for Foundation employees. In my letter requesting review, I had sufficiently justified the need to extend the time limit within the meaning of point (a). To describe them as briefly as possible, the extraordinary context of my claims against the GSTT – that it had engaged in a five-year inter-ministerial cover-up of medical evidence indicating a historic medical atrocity of unprecedented and horrific scale (albeit outside the GSTT, but within the NHS in 1967) – meant that there was enormous institutional pressure. which ran counter to the disclosure of evidence. In this context, the response of the various GSTT departments to whom I sought information on the evidence was to interpret my suspicions as “delusional”, which resulted in a series of referrals to community mental health services initiated by GSTT and facilitated through the administrative channels of my GP practice.
In addition, and at the same time as my request for a copy of my brain MRI from the Information Governance Information Department at St. Thomas Hospital in December 2010, I began to suffer a series of assassination attempts (for more explanation, see pages 84-87 of my report; or the page: Assassination attempts). My efforts to provide evidence of these attempts by the St. Thomas Emergency Department and police were also treated as “delusional,” resulting in further referrals to the Community Mental Health Team, and the evidence was not disclaimed. Now I no longer had access to health services or to protect the police from a series of attacks on my life; Circumstances that have continued (with some periods of relative respite) from December 2010 to the present, and which have clearly resulted in direct and indirect consequences of my attempts to uncover evidence of a historic NHS atrocity. You can reach our legal department at the following email addresses: For over 500 years, we have been a constant in London`s ever-changing landscape and at the forefront of healthcare. We are looking for an experienced legal advisor (approximately 0-6 years PQE) to work closely with our team focused on creating and advising innovative partnerships to reduce health inequalities in Lambeth, Southwark and beyond, advising on a variety of legal issues and negotiating agreements with our partners. This role is critical to achieving our ambitious goals by providing invaluable support to the Foundation`s colleagues.