Drawing attention to the probation officer`s ability to pass the probationary period or ministerial examination, if applicable,2 should be an essential part of the qualification for confirmation, but there should be a very careful assessment of the perspective, nature and suitability for the type of work that must be performed in the service before a test worker is confirmed. A probation officer will have the opportunity to work under the direction of more than one officer during this period, and reports on his or her work may be obtained from each of these officers. Probation reports for the entire period may then be reviewed by a group of senior officials to determine whether the probation officer in question is fit to be confirmed on duty. To that end, different forms of reporting should be used which are different. using the usual APAR (Annual Performance Evaluation Report) forms. Probationary reports, unlike the APAR, are written to help the supervisor focus on the specific needs of the probationary period in order to decide whether the officer`s work and conduct during the probationary period or the extended probationary period are satisfactory enough to justify his or her continued service or after the probationary period. Reports on probationary periods therefore do not serve the purpose for which PPARs are written and vice versa. Therefore, for all probation officers or probation officers, separate probation reports should be prepared in addition to the usual APARS for the probationary period. If there is no probation service in the county that serves the court, the court will place the offender under the general control and supervision of the Adult Parole Board, regardless of the offender`s country of residence, unless the court has entered into an agreement with the authority, as described in section 2301.32, Section B or C of the Revised Act. or under an agency authorized under section B) of section 2301.27 of the Revised Code to provide probation and supervision services to counties to report to the court a violation of one of the sanctions, a condition of release under a community control sanction imposed by the court, a violation of the law, or the offender`s departure from that state without the permission of the court or probation of the offender. (C) If, for an extended period, an offender meets the conditions for a sanction imposed under §§ 2929.16, 2929.17 or 2929.18 of the Revised Code in an exemplary manner, the court may shorten the time limit provided for in the sanction or impose a less restrictive sanction, but it may not allow the offender to violate any law or allow the offender: to leave the State without the authorization of the court. or the offender`s probation officer.
The duration of all Community control penalties imposed on an infringer under this Division shall not exceed five years. Where the offender evades or otherwise leaves the jurisdiction of the court in which he resides without obtaining permission from the court or probation officer of the offender to leave the jurisdiction of the court, or if the offender is detained in an institution for having committed a criminal offence while liable to a community supervision sentence, The duration of the Community control penalty shall no longer run until the offender is submitted to the court for further prosecution. If the court orders the offender to one or more penalties of non-residence under section 2929.17 of the Revised Act, the court will impose as a condition of non-residence sanctions that the offender must comply with the law for the duration of the sanctions and may not leave the State without the permission of the court or probation officer of the offender. The court may impose any other condition of release under a community control sanction it deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, the requirement that the offender not take or be injected with an abusive drug and that he or she undergo random drug testing in accordance with Section D of this Section to determine whether the offender has taken or been injected with a drug. abusive; and to require that the results of the drug test indicate that the offender has not taken or been injected with an abusive drug. Except for exceptional reasons, the probationary period should not be extended by more than one year and under no circumstances should a worker be kept on probation for more than twice the normal duration. 2. If no laboratory or agency described in section (D)(1) of this section has entered into a contract in accordance with that division, the probation service, the Adult Parole Board or any other agency that exercises general control and supervision of the offender in accordance with section (A)(2)(a) of this section shall encourage the offender to undergo random drug testing: that are conducted by a reputable public laboratory to determine whether the person who is being tested for drugs who has been taken or injected with a drug abuse. (iii) A court may not limit itself to the number of times it may sentence an offender to imprisonment under section (B)(1)(c) of this section if the offender violates the terms of a community control sanction or violates a law or leaves the State without the authorization of the court or probation officer of the offender. If an offender who is under community control under a sanction violates the terms of the sanction or violates a law, or leaves the state without the authorization of the court or probation officer of the offender, is sentenced to imprisonment for the violation or conduct, is released from prison after serving and subsequently violates the terms of the sanction or violates any law, Or the state without the With the authorization of the offender`s court or probation officer, the court may impose a new sentence of imprisonment on the offender under paragraph (B)(1)(c) of this section for the violation or subsequent conduct. (c) A term of imprisonment for the offender under section 2929.14 of the Revised Code and division (B)(3) of this section, provided that a term of imprisonment imposed under that division is subject to the following restrictions and rules: A probation officer who is not making satisfactory progress should be informed of his or her deficiencies before the end of the initial probationary period so that he or she can make special efforts to improve. This may be done by means of a written warning that its general performance was not adequate to justify its confirmation and that the issue of discharge should be examined, unless it shows a substantial improvement within a certain period of time.